🔗 Share this article

Families of people laid to rest in graves at risk from shoreline retreat argue that a lack of decision over how to address the problem is creating unnecessary distress about the eternal homes of their loved ones.

An Impending Danger to Ancient Graveyards

The council have singled out three burial grounds in the villages of Happisburgh, Mundesley, and Trimingham as being in danger of being swallowed by the ocean in the next few generations.

A recent report on the issue details a range of options, from taking no action to exhuming remains and reburying them in more secure sites. Authorities say it is for the community to determine how to move forward.

“At the moment we’re in a state of uncertainty. It causes me distress. My parents intended this to serve as their last home, but it won't be because of the sea.”

Estimates indicate at least part of one churchyard could fall into the sea in the next 80 years, but some residents worry it will happen much sooner. “In my view it’s got under 20 years, if you look at what’s happened in the last 30 years,” a farmer stated.

Troubled by the Past

A local business owner remembered a childhood visit to the neighbouring village of Eccles, which has almost entirely vanished into the water, along with its place of worship and burial ground.

“You could see people’s bones,” she said. “Some have this idealized notion that people’s remains will just get carried away to the ocean. That is not the case. People will take bones as souvenirs and go grave robbing looking for treasures. That is completely disrespectful.”

“I’m worried that the same thing that befell at Eccles will occur at Happisburgh and there’ll be bones on the beach. I’d be appalled by that.”

A Paratrooper's Resting Place in Peril

Along the shoreline is situated the grave of a ex-soldier killed while working abroad. His mother said she lost sleep after discovering her child's grave might one day be relocated.

“It truly trouble me to consider this won’t be his permanent home,” she said. “For us it’s an significant place to go.”

In her view, new burials should stop but says it is premature to exhume existing graves. “What I would choose for now is to do nothing and watch carefully, but an early decision must be made when a critical moment has been reached.”

Seeking Answers and Certainty

An absence of agreement over when and how to tackle the challenge has left grieving relatives feeling exasperated and worried.

Some want additional sea defences to delay the inevitable erosion and to allow funerals to continue for now. Others argue the time for moving graves is approaching.

“It is very emotive,” a family member stated. “The council’s report was really good, but now there’s uncertainty about how it is taken forward. And all parties is washing their hands over who is accountable.”

A coastal manager said the graveyards were owned and managed of the local diocese. “Ultimately it is up to them to choose the direction to take. We are here to help support them through that process with residents.”

It was also stated there was time to weigh all the options. “We are talking decades before it starts to be lost.”

“Currently, there exists no unified opinion on what should happen yet. We need productive community discussions to find the right solutions for each community.”

The prospect of the loss of the historic sites was labeled one of “profound sorrow for the area,” but church representatives also spoke of a doctrine in resurrection, providing a spiritual viewpoint on the physical disappearance of hallowed earth.